Showing posts with label Nashville DUI Lawyers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nashville DUI Lawyers. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 9, 2014

Nashville DUI Lawyers–Barnette Law Offices

Breath Test
If you have been arrested and charged with driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) in Davidson County, Tennessee, you are likely familiar with the Intoximeter EC/IR II.  This device is utilized by law enforcement officers in Nashville Metro after a DUI arrest to determine an individual’s blood alcohol content (BAC).  Contrary to what you may have heard, breath testing devices, like the Intoximeter EC/IR II, are not without flaws and routinely produce inaccurate results in DUI cases.

For example, symptoms associated with diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), liver disease, heartburn, asthma or other illness have historically enhanced the results of breath test machines in Tennessee.  The same is true for some types of chewing gum, breath mints and cough syrup.  Only seasoned DUI defense lawyers like Jason Barnette and those at Barnette Law Offices can successfully challenge the results of the breath test in Tennessee.

Prior to the administration of the Intoximeter EC/IR II test, law enforcement officers are required by Tennessee law to hold the subject under constant observation for a period of at least 20 minutes to ensure no foreign substance is introduced into the mouth of the subject.  Otherwise, the breath test result is inadmissible.

In a DUI case in the Nashville Metro area, police officers are the individuals designated to administer the breath test.  However, law enforcement officers typically receive minimal training about how the machine actually functions.  A good Tennessee DUI defense attorney can determine whether the officer in your case followed protocol and properly administered the breath test.

If you disagree with the results of the breath test after being arrested for DUI, you have a right under Tennessee DUI law to request a blood or urine test.  In fact, the State is required to initially cover the cost of the test if you are unable to pay for the test at the time of your arrest for DUI.


Every case is different and every DUI lawyer is different.  You want a DUI lawyer with the most experience, the best reputation and most importantly, the ability to get you the best result.  If results matter to you, call Barnette Law Offices today for a free consultation!

Field Sobriety Test
In Tennessee, if an officer has reasonable grounds to believe a driver is DUI or impaired, he may request that the driver perform field sobriety tests.  Be advised that in Tennessee, field sobriety tests are voluntary.  There is no criminal or administrative penalty for refusal of field sobriety tests during a DUI investigation.

Field sobriety tests are divided attention tests which require an individual charged with DUI to follow instructions and perform physical maneuvers requiring balance and coordination.  According to NHTSA, an individual with a BAC above .08 g/dL will have difficulty performing these standardized tests.

In Tennesee, the most common field sobriety tests utilized are the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test, the Walk and Turn Test, and the One Leg Stand Test (note the HGN test is inadmissible).  Numerous reasons exist as to why an individual may struggle with field sobriety tests other than intoxication or impairment.  For example, these tests are routinely administered late at night to individuals who are tired and frightened with the consequences of a DUI arrest fresh on their mind.  Medical conditions, including pre-existing injuries and weight, can impact the field sobriety test results.

If you have been arrested for DUI in Nashville, Davidson County or anywhere in Tennessee and performed field sobriety tests, it is crucial that you contact an attorney right away to explore all possible defenses to the allegation of the arresting officer.


The Nashville DUI Lawyer Jason Barnette and Barnette Law Offices are ready to put their skill and knowledge to work for you!

DUI Drugs
Law Enforcement officers throughout Tennessee and particularly, Nashville have recently started cracking down on drivers perceived to be impaired by controlled substances or drugs. Many believe that in order to be arrested for DUI with drugs or controlled substances in Tennessee, an individual must have taken some type of illegal substance.   It may surprise you to learn that in Tennessee, a driver can be arrested for DUI simply for driving after taking prescribed medication.

In defending against a DUI with drugs charge, it is critical that you be proactive in your defense.  For example, upon release from custody, securing an independent blood or urine test immediately following the arrest can be a useful tool to prove the amount of drugs or controlled substances consumed was not enough to cause impairment.  Oftentimes, law enforcement officers in DUI cases never take the appropriate steps to secure blood or urine test samples through the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation.

Law enforcement officers throughout the State of Tennessee are being certified as Drug Recognition Experts (DRE) trained to secure evidence in DUI cases.   In cases involving DUI with drugs or controlled substances, it is imperative that you contact an attorney skilled in DRE tactics to defend you.

It is imperative that you contact a DUI attorney skilled in DRE tactics, like Tennessee DUI Lawyer Jason Barnette and those at Barnette Law Offices, to defend you.right away!

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Barnette Law Offices–Nashville DUI Attorneys

At , we have been defending those accused of for years.  uses several basic legal and scientific examinations in defending against DUI charges.  The actions of the police are governed by numerous policies, procedure and laws. Mistakes, misunderstandings, or errors from the initial contact to the final booking may be helpful in .

An improper stop is one of the most common mistakes police officers make in a .  For example, tips or anonymous calls - in most – does not give an officer a proper basis to pull you over. The officer must observe an actual violation of the law before the stop is legal.

An officer does not have ample cause to pull you over if his stop is predicated upon a mistake of law.  An example is weaving in the lane or “slapping the mustard an mayonase” as some officers refer to weaving.- This observation alone in not a proper basis to stop a driver.  For many reasons a driver may drift or weave within the lane.

Furthermore, an officers may not stop you on a “hunch”.  However, rarely will an officer admit this, but devoid of any other evidence the act speaks for itself. This is why it is imperative to examine the officers video in a timely fashion.

There are also many reasons why the actual arrest may be unlawful.  Field Sobriety Tests are standardized roadside agility tests that are subjectively “scored” by an officer to make an arrest. These subjectively scored tests do have specific rules and guidelines for observations as prescribed by NHSTA. If they are not followed then any and all conclusions by the officer would be improper.

Moreover, rain, snow, and extreme cold or heat can effect observations of driving and performance on FST’s. Failure to consider these factor can affect credibility of the officer.  There are numerous medical and physical conditions that can affect a person’s roadside behavior and performance. These issues should be considered and factored into an officers arrest decision.  Often they are not and in reality, these tests are designed to fail.  If you are asked to perform Field Sobriety Tests, we at advise you to respectfully advise the officer that you do not wish to have them administered.  You are very likely going to be arrested anyway and while flawed, field sobriety tests may be used against you.

Once the officer has completed his reason for the initial stop; he should terminate the contact and allow you to leave unless there are clearly articulated reasons to extend the detention.  Such reasons could be the allegation that the officer “smelled” alcohol eminating from the accused or that the accused had red, watery eyes.  , advises anyone never to speak to an officer as to whether they’ve been drinking.  The common statement of “I’ve had one or two” often leads to a conviction.

In some cases that we see, the officers video simple doesn’t support arrest narrative.  Most law enforcement agencies in middle Tennessee use videos.  When the videos are available, they may not support the arrest or may show facts different from what is in the police report.

Blood draws – whether whole blood or plasma – require specific reasons under . If these are not followed, the test may be inadmissible under the exclusionary rule.  In addition, there are statutory requirements that enumerate specific procedures that must be followed in performing a blood test (and breath tests as is the case in ).  Blood samples are typical not tested by an employee of the TBI. Multiple samples are loaded in a machine; it runs overnight and prints out multiple reports in the morning. This is open to many human and machine mistakes.

The same applies to breath tests to which are used to determine an accused’s blood alcohol concentration.  The operator of the machine must be certified and many officers are not.  The intoxillizer machine must be certified and periodically calibrated at least every 90 days.  Sometimes this does not occur and alarmingly, sometime the mouth piece for test subjects are not changed.

There are specific procedures that must be followed before a proper test can be administered.  Although does not require a reading of your Miranda rights in order to make a DUI arrest, if the officer continues to question you after your arrest, many statements may be excludable if you are not read or do not understand your Miranda rights.

If a witness was responsible for your initial stop or other key element, they will also have to appear at key sections of the case.  If the officer gives different stories, in his report from later testimony, it brings his credibility into question (although a will couch inconsistent statements as a mistake rather than trying to make the officer out to be a liar).

The have expert witnesses who often can analyze reports, breath tests, blood tests (retrograde extrapolation) and video tapes to help determine if the arrest was proper and the facts are correctly presented.  It is a medical fact that during the early stage of drinking, you will show an artificial “peak” while absorbing the alcohol. This means that during the early stages of absorbing alcohol-before it is fully absorbed into your system, you will present an inaccurately high blood alcohol concentration.

If you are charged with a DUI in middle Tennessee, please contact the skilled at as soon as possible.a

n artificially

Nashville DUI Lawyer

header_barnettelaw

DUI cases are complex inasmuch as there is a blend of both legal and scientific issues involved.  Many make mistakes and these mistakes can harm their clients.  of Barnette Law Offices has included some of the mistakes below.

Some DUI Lawyers look at the police report, breath test sample or blood test results, and assume that the cannot be won. Breath tests, blood samples and field sobriety tests all have flaws that can be presented by an experienced .  Never assume defeat in any driving under the influence case - these cases can be won.

For starters, breath test results can be challenged for many reasons.  These machines flawed for they do not test deep lung air and are affected by any mouth alcohol.  Moreover, they must calibrated.  Some people have health conditions such as acid reflux, diabetes or are simply belching at the time of the test.  These reasons alone can cause inaccurate readings.

An experienced will always examine the traffic stop.  This is a fundamental part of both .  The police must have some legal justification for the traffic stop.  Some simply miss this point and fail to raise issues that could potentially lead to the ultimate dismissal of their client’s case by virtue of suppression.  Sometimes the mere act of filing a suppression motion makes the prosecution re-evaluate their position.  Bad traffic stops can lead to DUI cases either being dismissed or reduced to a lesser charge. 

While field sobriety tests are non-scientific and subjective, the location of the tests should be fair to the accused.  Heavy traffic, loose impediments, extreme weather, poor lighting or police lights, and unleveled surfaces can call into the question the reliability of these coordination tests.  It is always important to put these tests into content for the jury so that they can see why someone’s performance may have been unsatisfactory.  These tests are designed to fail and any obstacles can make them even more difficult to perform.  When done right, it is not difficult to show a jury these tests are fundamentally unfair. 

When the arresting officer was trained in field sobriety testing, he originally learned how to administer the tests through an instructor and his training manual.  This manual lays out guidelines that the police must follow when they administer these field sobriety tests.  Many know little about these tests or the rules that the police officer is supposed to follow per the NHSTA guidelines. 

This manual should be studied at length by your lawyer.  In fact, they should own a copy.  This way they will know exactly what questions to ask when the DUI officer takes the stand.  If the tests were not properly given, then their results can be called into question.  The tests are only as good as the officer’s instructions and training.  A successful challenge to these tests will weaken the prosecution’s case. 

It typically is not a good decision to have the DUI accused testify at trial.  They are not experienced witnesses and their testimony usually adds little to the defense.  The primary objective of the defense attorney is show the jury that the prosecution’s case is not strong enough to convict beyond a reasonable doubt.  When the defendant testifies, the trial focus is then placed on the credibility of the defendant verses the arresting officer’s investigation.  The jury is then forced to choose sides.  The defendant will seldom win this battle.

The state wants it to be a battle of credibility.  The prosecutor will jump up and down accusing the defendant of lying.  This shifts the focus away from the actual flaws and defenses of the actual DUI case.  If the cop lies, the jury will see it on their own.  It doesn’t have to be pointed out by the defendant or his attorney.  Reasonable doubt can be created without showing that the arresting officer is a liar.  It is a better practice to explain to the jury that the field sobriety tests are subjective in nature and the officer made a mistake of judgment.  Most jurors do not want to believe that the cop lied.  However, they will accept a mistake has been made.

 

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Nashville DUI Lawyer

are unique in the sense that  it is one of the few misdemeanors that are heavily prosecuted.  Typically, DUI charges arise from poor judgment, but nonetheless they are considered serious crimes.  However, police officers in make mistakes while doing their job in .  Mistakes can arise with respect to the reason you were stopped, administration of field sobriety tests, chemical tests to determine your blood alcohol concentration, etc.  At and his team works hard to ensure all the circumstances surrounding your DUI arrest are examined in order to achieve the best outcome for your situation.

The penalties for even a first offense are harsh. A carries the following punishment:

  • Mandatory Minimum of 48 hours in jail (If BAC greater than .20, mandatory 7 days in jail)
  • Maximum $1,500 Fine
  • Loss of drivers license for one year
  • Community Service
  • Ignition Interlock Mandatory with BAC greater than .08

With said and while strives to have every DUI case dismissed or reduced to reckless driving or reckless endangerment, there are several options available to allow you to drive while your license is suspended. Restricted licenses permit you to travel to and from work, school, and certain other functions. In most cases, installation of the ignition interlock device would permit you to drive anywhere at anytime, however requires you to blow into the machine prior to starting your vehicle each time. In 2013, was amended yet again to require anyone whose blood alcohol concentration is over .08 to have ignition interlock installed in their vehicles in order to obtain a restricted drivers’ license from the Department of Safety.  can help you obtain such a license if you are convicted or plea to a .

Perhaps the most common misconception about a Jason Barnette examines each DUI case on its own facts.  Each district attorney will weigh certain factors when determining their offer.  Each judicial district in is different in terms of procedure and if they will even offer reductions.  Our job at as experienced is to analyze your case, identify the best defense and present the factor which weighs most heavily in your favor.

Do not be naïve and attempt to handle a DUI charge in middle Tennessee without an skilled .  Often there are issues which arise with cases that non-attorneys would never recognize. The law regarding are complex. Obtaining a proper analysis is important in any legal matter and it is imperative in a scenario where you could face jail time. There are many aspects of a DUI arrest in Tennessee which require careful analysis both from a factual standpoint and legal standpoint. Our offers free consultations for all and surrounding counties.

Saturday, January 5, 2013

Nashville DUI Lawyer

Jason Barnette of Barnette Law Offices, LLC, focuses upon aggressively defending people arrested and charged with DUI in Nashville and throughout Tennessee. Nashville DUI Defense Attorney Jason Barnette serves clients throughout the state of Tennessee and is dedicated to aggressively defending his clients. Barnette Law Offices, LLC, is considered to be among the best DUI / Drunk Driving defense firms in middle Tennessee and Jason Barnette has earned a reputation for successfully representing DUI / Drunk Driving clients in Nashville, Dickson, Knox County, Rutherford County, Williamson County, Wilson County, Rutherford County and across Tennessee.

With vast experience and state of the art resources in the area of DUI / Drunk Driving defense, Barnette Law Offices, LLC, represents each DUI / Drunk Driving client personal care and attention a client expects.

Clients appreciate the comprehensive and supportive legal representation they receive from the dedicated staff and attorneys at Barnette Law Offices, LLC. Our Tennessee DUI / Drunk Driving team has successfully represented clients in middle and throughout Tennessee in cases ranging from first-time DUI / Drunk Driving offenses to repeat DUI / Drunk Driving offenses as well as felony DUI / Drunk Driving cases that can carry significant penalties, including jail or prison time.

Barnette Law Offices, LLC, also gets many of it’s clientele no jail time even with a guilty plea. Contact the Nashville, Tennessee DUI Law Firm of Barnette Law Offices, LLC at 615-585-2245 today.

BLlogoFinal

Technorati Tags: Nashville DUI Lawyers,Nashville DUI Attorneys,Tennessee DUI Lawyers

 

December 16, 2009

Nashville DUI Lawyer

If you have been arrested in Nashville or in Tennessee for DUI, you face serious criminal penalties and the loss of your drivers’ license. You need an an experienced Tennessee DUI Defense lawyer to assist you in the State’s prosecution. Contact the aggressive Nashville DUI Defense team at Barnette Law Offices, LLC in Nashville, Tennessee for a free initial consultation about your DUI case.

Barnette Law Offices, LLC’s experience with the investigation and defense of Tennessee DUI charges will give you the professional legal help you need to keep you out of mandatory jail time and protecting your driving license. We know how to spot the weaknesses in the State’s case from the initial stop through booking.

DUI dui 2 breath test

At Barnette Law Offices, LLC, we are not timid about taking your case before a jury of your peers to prove your legal innocence if you desire. This is in stark contrast to many Tennessee attorney’s which erroneously feel DUI cases cannot be won. They can!

Davidson County Criminal Court expungment

Contact the skilled DUI Defense Lawyers at Barnette Law Offices, LLC if you’re facing a DUI or Implied Consent charge in Nashville or Tennessee.

Technorati Tags: Nashville DUI Lawyers,Nashville DUI Lawyer,Tennessee DUI Lawyer,Tennessee DUI Lawyers

Sunday, March 28, 2010

Nashville DUI Lawyer – Barnette Law Offices, LLC

are similar to the DUI laws of most jurisdictions.  However, is one of the few crimes for which an individual can be convicted solely on the testimony of an arresting officer. While most Tennessee DUI offenses are classified as misdemeanors, a conviction for a fourth offense is a felony.  Moreover, the penalties for a are much more severe than in most jurisdictions.  This is why it is imperative that if you are charged and arrested for a DUI in the that you retain a .

Tennessee DUI law essentially requires the District Attorney General’s Office to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person was (1) operating or in physical control of (2) a motor vehicle on (3) any public road, highway, alley, parking lot, or any other premises generally frequented by the public while (4) under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or with a blood alcohol content, or BAC, of .08% or higher.

A such as those at typically attack elements one, three and four.  However, an officer must first have probable cause to make an arrest for DUI.  Even if probable cause is found for the arrest, element four can often be difficult to prove.

A can punch holes in the way in which field sobriety tests were performed and how a BAC test was performed as well.  At we do this frequently and successfully in Davidson, Dickson, Rutherford, Wilson, and Williamson Counties as well as throughout Tennessee.

The implications of failing to retain an can be catastrophic.  Upon conviction for First Offence DUI in Tennessee, a person is subject to a maximum sentence of 11 months, 29 days, with a minimum of 48 hours in jail, or a minimum of 7 days in jail if, at the time of the offense, the defendant's blood alcohol level was .20% or higher.  Tennessee DUI laws for merely first offense also require a minimum $350.00 fine and court costs, the loss of your drivers license for a period of one year and enrollment in a court approved victim impact panel as well as DUI classes. Penalties for a second or subsequent conviction of DUI increase dramatically. On a second or subsequent offense, the vehicle used in the offense is subject to forfeiture.  A fourth or subsequent conviction of DUI is classified as a Felony.

If you’ve been charged with a DUI in Tennessee, please contact the at by visiting http://www.barnettelawoffices.com or calling 615-585-2245.

Sunday, January 31, 2010

Barnette Law Offices, LLC – DUI Defense Lawyers

If you have been arrested in Nashville or in Tennessee for DUI, you face serious criminal penalties and the loss of your drivers’  license.  You need an to assist you in the State’s prosecution.  Contact the at in Nashville, Tennessee for a free initial consultation about your DUI case.

’s experience with the investigation and defense of Tennessee DUI charges will give you the professional legal help you need to keep you out of mandatory jail time and protecting your driving license. know how to spot the weaknesses in the State’s case from the initial stop through booking.

At , we are not timid about taking your case before a jury of your peers to prove your legal innocence if you desire.  This is in stark contrast to many Tennessee attorney’s which erroneously feel DUI cases cannot be won.  They can!

Contact the skilled DUI Defense Lawyers at if you’re facing a DUI or Implied Consent charge in Nashville or Tennessee.

Sunday, January 24, 2010

AVVO Ranks Barnette Law Offices, LLC One Of The Best DUI Defense Firms

Barnette Law Offices, LLC One Of Most Searched Nashville DUI Defense Firms On http://www.avvo.com

 was recently named one of the most searched Nashville and Tennessee DUI Defense Law Firms by .  Please review below the testimonials Barnette Law Offices, LLC has garnered:

Great Nashville Divorce Lawyer

Posted by: anonymous, 2010-01-17 7 days ago. Flag as objectionable

Overall rating

5 star rating

Trustworthy

5.0 star rating

Responsive

5.0 star rating

Knowledgeable

5.0 star rating

Kept me informed

5.0 star rating

  • I recommend Jason Barnette.
  • I used Jason 6-12 months ago.
  • Jason handled my Divorce / Separation matter.
  • I have previously worked with 1-2 lawyers.

Client Review:

Jason Barnette and Barnette Law Offices, LLC in Nashville did a great job for me on my divorce. They were compassionate, experienced, and responsive. We had only two court dates, one mediation and the whole thing was done.
I'd recommend Barnette Law Offices and Jason Barnette for anyone looking for a Tennessee Divorce Lawyer.

Add a comment

Jason Wade Barnette

Jason Barnette, Good Divorce Attorney

Posted by: anonymous, 2009-11-14 2 months ago. Flag as objectionable

Overall rating

5 star rating

Trustworthy

5.0 star rating

Responsive

5.0 star rating

Knowledgeable

5.0 star rating

Kept me informed

5.0 star rating

  • I recommend Jason Barnette.
  • I used Jason 6-12 months ago.
  • Jason handled my Divorce / Separation matter.
  • I have previously worked with 1-2 lawyers.

Client Review:

Jason Barnette and his firm at Barnette Law Offices, LLC in Nashville, Tennessee are very good at all area's in which they practice. I first came to them with an unemployment appeal. He won and I got all back pay. He then undertook my workers compensation claim. We already getting ready to produce the settlement terms to Court (less than four months). He also handled my daughters simple possession charge in which he got the case dismissed. Finally, and as a result of the above charge, my former spouse and I needed a divorce. Jason Barnette and his staff at Barnette Law Offices took care of that as well.
All in all, I find him very responsive (within reason, I mean he calls back in a 48 hour period). Moreover, he is just very aggressive in all that he pursues. He puts his heart and soul in to his clients cases.

Add a comment

Jason Wade Barnette

Good DUI Attorney

Posted by: anonymous, 2009-11-03 3 months ago. Flag as objectionable

Overall rating

5 star rating

Trustworthy

5.0 star rating

Responsive

5.0 star rating

Knowledgeable

5.0 star rating

Kept me informed

5.0 star rating

  • I recommend Jason Barnette.
  • I used Jason 6-12 months ago.
  • Jason handled my DUI / DWI matter.
  • I have previously worked with 1-2 lawyers.

Client Review:

Got a 1st offense DUI charge dropped to reckless driving and implied consent violation dropped completely. Rutherford County General Sessions Court.
Jason Barnette and his staff at Barnette Law Offices are top notch. I'd recommend him to anyone.

Add a comment

Jason Wade Barnette

Best Criminal Defense Attorney in Nashville, Tennessee

Posted by: anonymous, 2009-10-28 3 months ago. Flag as objectionable

Overall rating

5 star rating

Trustworthy

5.0 star rating

Responsive

5.0 star rating

Knowledgeable

5.0 star rating

Kept me informed

5.0 star rating

  • I recommend Jason Barnette.
  • I used Jason 1-6 months ago.
  • Jason handled my Criminal Defense matter.
  • I have previously worked with 1-2 lawyers.

Client Review:

Had a felony drug traffic charge. Jason Barnette filed some motion and nothing could come into court. The DA just dropped the charges after Attorney Barnette asked the judge to strike the charges.
Money well spent.
Barnette Law Offices, LLC isn't huge but, they're good. You can actually get ahold of Jason and his staff and they deliver. Pricing is reasonable and considering he holds true to his word, I'd highly recommend Barnette Law Offices, LLC.

Add a comment

Jason Wade Barnette

Great Nashville Divorce Lawyer

Posted by: anonymous, 2009-10-22 3 months ago. Flag as objectionable

Overall rating

5 star rating

Trustworthy

5.0 star rating

Responsive

5.0 star rating

Knowledgeable

5.0 star rating

Kept me informed

5.0 star rating

  • I recommend Jason Barnette.
  • I used Jason more than 3 years ago.
  • Jason handled my Divorce / Separation matter.
  • I have previously worked with 1-2 lawyers.

Client Review:

Jason Barnette is a terrific divorce lawyer. I retained in firm of Barnette Law Offices in Nashville and they got me a through a very tough contested divorce. I really got more than what I thought I would and his prices are fair.
Outstanding divorce attorney.

Add a comment

Jason Wade Barnette

Outstanding Child Custody Attorney - Best in Tennessee

Posted by: anonymous, 2009-10-19 3 months ago. Flag as objectionable

Overall rating

5 star rating

Trustworthy

5.0 star rating

Responsive

5.0 star rating

Knowledgeable

5.0 star rating

Kept me informed

5.0 star rating

  • I recommend Jason Barnette.
  • I used Jason 6-12 months ago.
  • Jason handled my Divorce / Separation matter.
  • I have previously worked with no lawyers.

Client Review:

Jason Barnette and his staff at Barnette Law Offices, LLC got me full custody of my children and the maximum child support. He also got my ex to agree to pay for their college educations.
He is a great lawyer in my opinion.

Add a comment

Jason Wade Barnette

Barnette Law Offices -Terrific Family Lawyers

Posted by: anonymous, 2009-10-13 3 months ago. Flag as objectionable

Overall rating

5 star rating

Trustworthy

5.0 star rating

Responsive

5.0 star rating

Knowledgeable

5.0 star rating

Kept me informed

5.0 star rating

  • I recommend Jason Barnette.
  • I used Jason 6-12 months ago.
  • Jason handled my Child Support matter.
  • I have previously worked with 1-2 lawyers.

Client Review:

Jason Barnette of Barnette Law Office represented me in a child support matter. The were terrific throughout the proces and got me everything I could have possible asked for. I was impressed with Jason and would recommend his firm for anyone in Tennesse.

Add a comment

Jason Wade Barnette

Great DUI Lawyer

Posted by: anonymous, 2009-09-03 5 months ago. Flag as objectionable

Overall rating

5 star rating

Trustworthy

5.0 star rating

Responsive

5.0 star rating

Knowledgeable

5.0 star rating

Kept me informed

5.0 star rating

  • I recommend Jason Barnette.
  • I used Jason 6-12 months ago.
  • Jason handled my DUI / DWI matter.
  • I have previously worked with no lawyers.

Client Review:

Jason Barnette represented me in a DUI matter in Nashville, Tennessee. I am from Kentucky and had heard bad things regarding the criminal courts in Nashville. Jason assured me that he could keep me out of jail and the fines to a minimum. Not only did he accomplish that, he got the charge reduced to a much lesser offense.
This guy is good and is very aggressive in terms of DUI defense. His office at Barnette Law Offices is top notch as well in terms of attentiveness to their clients.

Add a comment

Jason Wade Barnette

Excellent Employment Law Attorney

Posted by: anonymous, 2009-08-04 6 months ago. Flag as objectionable

Overall rating

5 star rating

Trustworthy

5.0 star rating

Responsive

5.0 star rating

Knowledgeable

5.0 star rating

Kept me informed

5.0 star rating

  • I recommend Jason Barnette.
  • I used Jason 6-12 months ago.
  • Jason handled my Employment / Labor matter.
  • I have previously worked with 1-2 lawyers.

Client Review:

Jason Barnette is an excellent employment law attorney. He represented me in my claim against my former employer in both a civil action and unemployment appeal. We settled the first and he had the second reversed.
Good as they come in my book.

Add a comment

Jason Wade Barnette

Good Defense Attorny

Posted by: anonymous, 2009-06-18 7 months ago. Flag as objectionable

Overall rating

5 star rating

Trustworthy

5.0 star rating

Responsive

5.0 star rating

Knowledgeable

5.0 star rating

Kept me informed

5.0 star rating

  • I recommend Jason Barnette.
  • I used Jason 1-3 years ago.
  • Jason handled my Criminal Defense matter.
  • I have previously worked with 1-2 lawyers.

Client Review:

I was charged with a few crimes by Metro. I spoke to Jason in his office and he told me what I could be looking at in terms of jail time but, that I may be able to get off on some of it because of the way I was arrested. Sure enough, Mr. Barnette had all the charges dropped.
I was impressed.
He's as good of a criminal defense lawyer as I've seen and he listens to you. I'd recommend him.

Add a comment

Jason Wade Barnette

Excellent DUI Attorney

Posted by: anonymous, 2009-06-16 7 months ago. Flag as objectionable

Overall rating

5 star rating

Trustworthy

5.0 star rating

Responsive

5.0 star rating

Knowledgeable

5.0 star rating

Kept me informed

5.0 star rating

  • I recommend Jason Barnette.
  • I used Jason 6-12 months ago.
  • Jason handled my Criminal Defense matter.
  • I have previously worked with 1-2 lawyers.

Client Review:

Jason Barnette is an excellent DUI defense attorney. He represented both me and my girlfriend in Wilson County General Sessions. We ended up not even going to jail (Swaim Center in Symrna), paid the minimum fines and had a restricted license as soon as we could possibly get them.
I'm not going into all the trumped up charges but, Jason did a wonderful job getting everything dropped.
He made us both feel very at ease and he did exactly what he said he would. Money well spent and I'd recommend him to anyone.

Add a comment

Please contact the skilled Nashville Criminal Defense Lawyers at for your needs or call 615-585-2245.